Merel Hoedt vs Sara Conde Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hoedt vs Conde analysis and find out who is favored!
Merel Hoedt vs Sara Conde Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hoedt 1 - 0 Conde
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hoedt has won 41.11% of points on their second serve, while Conde has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hoedt, in recent form, has won 57.26% of their opponent's second serve points, while Conde has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.59% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hoedt has saved 52.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Conde has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hoedt has won 60.29% of matches played (W/L 41/ 27), with Conde winning 37.5% (W/L 3/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hoedt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 105/ 81), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Conde has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 9/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 9/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Hoedt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 19), where as Conde has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 3/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hoedt winning 1 times and Conde being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hoedt winning 2 and Conde winning 0. The last match between Hoedt and Conde was at the W25 Tucuman, 22-02-2023, Second, Clay with Merel Hoedt getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hoedt and Conde have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hoedt winning 0 times and Conde 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hoedt winning 0, and Conde 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hoedt has played against opponents with an average rank of 185.9 while Conde has played against players with an average rank of 89.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hoedt has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Conde has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hoedt has converted 51.66% of breakpoint opportunities, and Conde has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Merel Hoedt
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
522
Rank
468
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
Sara Conde
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
55% (162-133)
Career Total W/L
43% (10-13)
57% (16-12)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Merel Hoedt | Sara Conde |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 11 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:24:0 | 1:24:0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (34/58) | 60% (32/53) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (24/34) | 47% (15/32) |
2nd Serve Win% | 33% (8/24) | 29% (6/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 80% (4/5) |
Return Points W% | 60% (32/53) | 45% (26/58) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-1 |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Sara Conde
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
5
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Merel Hoedt | Sara Conde |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 57% (16/12) | 33% (1/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (37/25) | 33% (2/4) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (311/261) | 42% (25/34) |
Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 33% (1/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.11 | 0 |
Aces Total | 31 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.64 | 0 |
DFs Total | 179 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:6 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 250.75 | 238.33 |
1st Serve % | 66% (1186/1799) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 62% (730/1186) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 41% (252/613) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 52% (140/271) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 49% (943/1930) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) | 33% (1/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (16/28) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Merel Hoedt Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Solana Sierra
Player
Merel Hoedt
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Angelina Wirges
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Anna Klasen
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Madison Sieg
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sina Herrmann
Player
Merel Hoedt
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
18
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
52%
(
47 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Valerija Maija Kargina
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Tilde Stromquist
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
6
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
27 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Merel Hoedt
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
2
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
25
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
57%
(
49 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Stephanie Judith Visscher
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Natalia Kowalczyk
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
28%
(
19 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Sara Conde Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 5-7 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 5-7 6-3 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more